(732) 251-9506 Ext.211
Navigation

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

PYURE AIR PURIFIER RAPIDLY DESTROYS COVID-19 VIRUS IN AIR AND ON SURFACES

Purifier Kills 99% of Airborne SARS-CoV-2 in 20 Minutes and Virus is No Longer Detected in Air After 80 Minutes; Purifier Kills 99% of SARS-CoV-2 on Surfaces in 1 Hour and Virus is No Longer Detected on Surfaces After 3 Hours

(BOYNTON BEACH, Fla.) December 1, 2020 – The PYURE Company announced that a recently completed study conducted by a certified, biosafety level 3 laboratory demonstrated that a portable commercial air purifier rapidly and dramatically destroys SARS Coronavirus 2

(SARS-CoV-2), the virus that causes COVID-19, both in the air and on surfaces.

The PYURE air purifier reduced airborne SARS-CoV-2 by 99% in 20 minutes and further reduced the virus in air to below the limit of detection in 80 minutes. The PYURE air purifier reduced surface-bound SARS-CoV-2 by 99% in one hour and further reduced the virus on surfaces to below the limit of detection in three hours.


“These impressive results add to our body of scientific evidence that PYURE technology rapidly and safely kills a wide range of viruses, bacteria and mold in air and on surfaces,” said PYURE Chief Scientist Dr. Connie Araps. “We are thrilled to confirm that PYURE technology rapidly kills airborne and surface-bound SARS-CoV-2 and can help protect against the spread of COVID-19.”


PYURE’s innovative, patented technology replicates the way sunlight sanitizes the outdoor environment by generating and diffusing hydroxyls and organic oxidants indoors. PYURE technology produces these natural sanitizing agents in the same concentrations typically found outdoors on a sunny day, so it can be safely operated continuously indoors. Unlike conventional air purifiers, PYURE’s sanitizing effect is not limited to the air that is pulled through the device. PYURE disperses organic oxidants throughout a space, dynamically sanitizing all air and surfaces. This enables PYURE devices to rapidly and safely kill viruses, bacteria and mold, decompose volatile organic compounds and neutralize odors, without harming occupants or materials.


“The global pandemic puts many people at risk. PYURE technology, when combined with personal safety measures, can help protect patients, healthcare workers, seniors, students, employees and patrons by rapidly killing the COVID-19 virus and reducing the risk of transmission. Our products will help end users navigate the current public health crisis and be better protected from future pathogens,” said PYURE Chief Executive Officer Jean-Francois Huc.


The trials were designed and conducted by Innovative Bioanalysis, a CLIA and CAP* certified laboratory located in Costa Mesa, California. The study was carried out in a large test chamber and was designed to simulate a real-life environment, taking into consideration the precautions needed when working in a Biosafety Level 3 containment area. The trials were conducted with a high starting concentration of SARS-CoV-2 virus for aerosolization and surface inoculation and were run in triplicate, with controls at every sampling time point. PYURE supplied the laboratory with an MDU/Rx™ freestanding portable unit, which is 25 inches in height and weighs 39 pounds. The MDU/Rx™ is registered with the FDA as a class II medical device. All PYURE air purification products and solutions are powered by the same hydroxyl and organic oxidant generating technology.



About The PYURE Company

image

The PYURE Company, formerly known as HGI Industries, designs, manufactures and markets commercial air purifiers that sanitize air and surfaces. PYURE’s innovative, patented technology replicates the way sunlight sanitizes the outdoor environment by safely generating and diffusing hydroxyls and organic oxidants indoors. PYURE markets products that destroy pathogens and improve air quality – from portable devices treating hundreds of square feet to HVAC-integrated solutions with sensor driven, integrated process controls treating hundreds of thousands of square feet. PYURE products can be purchased directly or through authorized distributors. An American manufacturer, PYURE was founded in 2007 and is based in Boynton Beach, Fla. For more information, visit www.pyureco.com.

image

* CLIA is an acronym for the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988. CAP is an acronym for the College of American Pathologists.

SARS-CoV-2

aerosolized (COVID-19 virus)

MS2 virus

aerosolized

(simulant for coronavirus)

PhiX174 virus

aerosolized

(simulant for smallpox)

Reduction

Time

Reduction

Time

Reduction

Time

99%

20 min

99.9%

30 min

99.9%

30 min

Not Detected

80 min

99.999%

90 min

99.99%

60 min

Staphylococcus E.

aerosolized

(gram + bacteria*)

E. herbicola

aerosolized (gram - bacteria*)

Aspergillus Niger

aerosolized (black mold)

Reduction

Time

Reduction

Time

Reduction

Time

99%

30 min

99%

30 min

99.9%

30 min

Not Detected

90 min

99.99%

120 min

Not Detected

90 min



Surface Pathogen Destruction



PYURE Technology kill rates on surface viruses and bacteria.

SARS-CoV-2 virus (COVID-19 virus)

on glass

Influenza (H1N1) virus

on glass


Norovirus (Murine)

on glass

Reduction

Time

Reduction

Time

Reduction

Time

99%

1 hour

96%

1 hour

94%

1 hour

Not Detected

3 hours

99.999%

6 hours

99.998%

6 hours

Poliovirus 1 (Sabin)

on glass


Adenovirus 5

on glass


E. Coli/Bacteria

stainless steel (s.s)/cotton

Reduction

Time

Reduction

Time

Reduction

Time

90%

1 hour

90%

1 hour

99.99%

3 hours (s.s)

99.99%

6 hours

99.99%

6 hours

99.9%

3 hours (cotton)

image

13 image PYURECO.COM

Airborne Pathogen Destruction

PYURE Technology kill rates on airborne viruses, bacteria and mold.

>99% reduction in 30 minutes

Innovative Bioanalysis 3188 Airway Ave Suite D Costa Mesa CA, 92626
www.InnovativeBioanalysis.com
Email: [email protected]


SARS-CoV-2USA-CA1/2020

CLIENT: The PYURE Company Inc. PROJECT: MDU/Rx™ Bioaerosol Test PRODUCT: ODOROX® MDU/Rx™

FDA Registration: 510(k) Number K133800 (Class II Medical Device) CAP LIC NO: 886029801

CLIA LIC NO: O5D0955926 STATE ID: CLF 00324630

CHALLENGE VIRUS: SARS-CoV-2 USA-CA1/2020

ABSTRACT: EFFICACY OF THE PYURE MDU/Rx™ DEVICE AGAINST AEROSOLIZED SARS-CoV-2

Background: This in vitro study was designed to determine the efficacy of the MDU/Rx™ unit. The product is a commercially available mobile disinfection device manufactured by The PYURE Company (PYURE) out of Boynton Beach, Florida. The MDU/Rx™ unit is designed to be placed free standing in a room and decrease the concentration of pathogens in the air and on surfaces when it is operating, in order to sanitize enclosed spaces and their contents. For this challenge, the SARS-CoV-2-CA1/2020 pathogen was used. The CDC estimates more than 10,000,000 people in the United States have been infected by SARS-CoV2 leading to an estimated 240,000 deaths between 2019 and 2020. Coronavirus can be spread through the air and by touching contaminated surfaces. There is a demand for disinfectant devices that have a proven ability to reduce infectious pathogens in the air thereby reducing the risk of human infection and transmission. PYURE supplied a pre-packaged MDU /Rx™ free standing unit for testing purposes. For the testing, power was supplied through a power regulated 120v outlet with surge protector and backup battery system. Test procedures were followed using internal SOPs for aerosolized viral pathogen challenges and subsequent decontamination. All internal SOPs and processes follow GCLP guidelines and recommendations.


Results: When tested against SARS-CoV-2-CA1/2020 virus, the PYURE MDU/Rx™ unit showed a progressive reduction during the time it was operated resulting in significant destruction of the virus. In three identical trials, the average reduction of aerosolized virus was 99% at the 20-minute sampling point and a steady, further reduction to greater than 99.98% at the 80-minute sampling point, where the virus was no longer detectable due to the limit of quantification. The average reduction of inoculated surface samples was 99% at the 60-minute sampling point and steady, further reduction to greater than 99.999% at the 180-minute sampling point, where the virus was no longer detectable due to the limit of quantification.

A close up of electronics Description automatically generated

EQUIPMENT PROVIDED: MANUFACTURER: The PYURE Company MODEL: MDU/Rx™

SERIAL #: MDURXA0000069

MDU/Rx™ EQUIPMENT:

The equipment arrived at the laboratory pre-packaged from the manufacturer and was inspected for damage upon arrival. Two mercury vapor UV optics were provided by the manufacturer to install in the device upon arrival. The optics were installed, and the device was powered on to check for normal operations. Prior to starting the challenge, the PYURE MDU/Rx™ unit was operated for over 6 hours of dry runs in a sealed bioaerosol to confirm correct operation of the. Chamber was the same BSL3 chamber used for the viral challenge testing.

VIRAL CHALLENGE TESTING CHAMBER:

The testing chamber was a large, sealed air volume testing chamber consisting of metal walls and epoxy floor which complied with BSL3 requirements for containment of an aerosolized pathogen. The chamber was designed to be completely sealed from the outside environment to prevent any potential release of testing media into the atmosphere. The testing chamber was equipped with 4 sealed viewing windows and a lockable chamber door for entry and exit. The overall dimensions of the test chamber were approximately 8’x8’x20’ with a displacement volume of 1280 cubic feet. Based on cubic foot volume the chamber had 36,245.56 liters of air.

The testing chamber had HEPA filtered inlets and exhaust, coupled with an active UV-C system in all ducting lines. Humidity and temperature were monitored inside the chamber using a calibrated wireless device. For air sample testing, the chamber was equipped with 4 probes that were along the centerline of the room and protruded down from the ceiling 24”. Each probe tube was connected to a Gilian 10i programmable system with sampling cassettes from lot # 18248 made by Sensidine. A single bioaerosol nebulizing port was in the center of the 20’ wall opposite of the entry doors. The

dissemination port protruded from the wall 24” and was connected to a programmable compressor nebulizer system.

Prior to testing, the chamber was pressure tested for leaks and visual inspections were made using a colored smoking device. All seals for the chamber were confirmed and all equipment used had a function test to confirm working conditions. For calibrated equipment, calibration records were checked to confirm operational status.

CHAMBER LAYOUT OVERHEAD 1:

Diagram Description automatically generated

DESIGN LAYOUT 3D:

Diagram Description automatically generated

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

BIOAEROSOL GENERATION:

For the control and the viral challenges, the nebulizer was filled with the same amount of viral stock (4.02 X 10^7 TCID50 per ml) and nebulized at a flow rate of 1ml/min. Nebulizer was driven by untreated local atmospheric air. The nebulizer’s remaining viral stock volume was weighed after each completion to confirm the same amount of viral stock that was nebulized.

BIOAEROSOL SAMPLING:

For air sampling, 4 different Gillian 10i programmable vacuum devices were used. Air samplers were calibrated by the manufacturer in September 2020 and certificates were inspected prior to use.

Air sample volume collections were confirmed prior to use with a Gilian Gilibrator 2 SN- 200700-12 and a high flow bubble generator SN-2009012-H. Air samplers were operated in conjunction with removable sealed cassettes, which were manually removed after each sampling time point. Cassettes had a delicate internal filtration disc to collect viral samples.

SAMPLING POINT TIMELINE:

image

VIRUS STRAIN BACKGROUND:

The following reagent was deposited by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and obtained through the BEI Resources, BIAID, NIH SARS-Related Coronavirus 2, Isolate USA-CA1/2020, NR- 52382. This was the chosen pathogen strain because it was taken from a 38-year-old subject with severe acute respiratory syndrome in California as was part of the A lineage. This was a non-fatal case which represents most of the cases in the United State. The age group the patient belonged to was not elderly or juvenile, which was determined to be a good medium average.

POST DECONTAMINATION:

At the conclusion of each viral challenge test the UV system inside the testing chamber was activated for 30 minutes. After 30 minutes of UV exposure the chamber was fogged with a Hydrogen Peroxide gas mixture followed by a 30-minute air purge. All test equipment was cleaned at the end of each day with a 70% alcohol solution. Collection lines were soaked in a bleach bath mixture for 30 minutes then rinsed repeatedly with DI water. Nebulizer and Vacuum collection pumps were decontaminated with Hydrogen Peroxide mixtures.

TCID50 PROCEDURE:

Materials and Equipment: Additions of virus dilutions to cells
  1. 1. Label lid of 96 well dish by drawing grid lines to delineate quadruplicates and number each grid to correspond to the virus sample and label the rows of the plate for the dilution which will be plated.

  2. 2. Include 4 Negative wells on each plate which will not be infected.

  3. 3. Remove all but 0.1 mL of media from each well by vacuum aspiration.

  4. 4. Starting from the most dilute sample, add 0.1 mL of virus dilution to each of the quadruplicate wells for that dilution

  5. 5. Infect 4 wells per dilution, working backward.

  6. 6. Allow the virus to absorb to cells at 37°C for 2 hours.

  7. 7. After absorption, remove virus inoculum. Start with the most dilute and work backwards

  8. 8. Add 0.5 mL infection medium to each well being careful to not touch the wells with the pipette.

  9. 9. Place plates at 37°C and monitor CPE using the inverted microscope over a period of 1 to 4 weeks.

  10. 10. Record the number of positive and negative wells.

CONTROL:

One Control test was conducted without the PYURE MDU/Rx™ unit in the testing chamber. Control samples were taken at each of the corresponding sample times used for the three identical challenge trials (see sampling timeline above). Nebulization of viral media and collection methods were the same for the control as the viral challenge. Control testing was used for the comparative baseline to assess the viral reduction when the PYURE MDU/Rx™ device was operated in the challenge trials, to enable net reduction calculations to be made. During the control test, four low volume fans were operated in each corner of the testing chamber to ensure homogenous mixing of the air. An emergency O3 alarm was outfitted to the room and calibrated to 1ppm. During the control test no O3 alarms were observed. During the control temperature and relative humidity were monitored and recorded.

VIRAL CHALLENGE:

The challenge pathogen, SARS-CoV-2-USA-CA1/2020, was used for testing the efficacy of the PYURE MDU/Rx™ device. During the challenge tests the pressure in the challenge chamber was monitored to confirm no portion of the chamber was leaking. The bioaerosol efficacy challenge was completed in three distinct trials with the live pathogen to create a baseline of data. The PYURE MDU/Rx™ device was placed in the same position for each viral challenge and operated in the same manner. Prior to nebulizing the viral pathogen, the PYURE MDU/Rx™ device was turned on and allowed to run for 15 minutes to simulate a real-world environment and allow the device to reach standard operating conditions. Four low volume mixing fans were used throughout the entire control test and viral pathogen test. Sample times were as follows with T equal to minutes, T-20, T-40, T-60, T-80, T-120, T-180. Sampling occurred using 4 automatic air volume samplers that operated simultaneously for each collection. Samplers were pre-set to automatically shut off after 5 minutes of collection. Collections were made via the equipment utilizing viral media coated filters for maximum pathogen trapping and stability. Collection samples were provided to lab staff for pooling after each collection time point. An emergency O3 alarm was outfitted to the room and calibrated to 1ppm. During the challenge tests no O3 alarms were observed. Prior to running the viral challenges temperature and humidity were confirmed to be in relative range to the control +/- 5%.

TESTING PROCEDURE:

TEST

SPECIFICATIONS

RESULTS

Identification by Infectivity in Vero 6

cells

Cell Rounding and

Detachment

Cell Rounding and

Detachment

Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) of complete genome using Illumina®

iSeq™ 100 Platform


(Approx. 940 Nucleotides

≥ 98% identity with SARS- CoV 2, isolate USA- CA1/2020

GenBank: MN994467.1


≥ 98% identity with SARS- CoV 2, strain FDAARGOS_983 isolate USA-CA1/2020

GenBank: MT246667.1

99.9% identity with SARS- CoV 2, isolate USA-CA1/2020 GenBank: MN994467.1


100% identity with SARS-CoV 2, strain FDAARGOS_983 isolate USA-CA1/2020 GenBank: MT246667.1

Titer by TCID50 in Vero E6 Cells by

Cytopathic effect

Report Results

2.8 X 10^5 TCID50 per mL in

5 days at 37°C and 5% CO2

Sterility (21-Day Incubation) Harpos HTYE Broth, aerobic Trypticase Soy Broth, aerobic Sabourad Broth, aerobic Sheep Blood Agar, aerobic Sheep Blood Agar, anaerobic

Thioglycollate Broth, anaerobic DMEM with 10% FBS


No Growth No Growth No Growth No Growth No Growth

No Growth No Growth


No Growth No Growth No Growth No Growth No Growth

No Growth No Growth

Sterility (21-Day Incubation) Harpos HTYE Broth, aerobic Trypticase Soy Broth, aerobic Sabourad Broth, aerobic Sheep Blood Agar, aerobic Sheep Blood Agar, anaerobic

Thioglycollate Broth, anaerobic

DMEM with 10% FBS


No Growth No Growth No Growth No Growth No Growth No Growth

No Growth


No Growth No Growth No Growth No Growth No Growth No Growth

No Growth

Mycoplasma Contamination Agar and Broth Culture

DNA Detection by PCR of extracted Test Article nucleic acid.


None Detected None Detected


None Detected None Detected

VIRAL STOCK: SARS-CoV-2 USA-CA1/2020 (BEI NR-52382)



Aerosolization of Viral Media:

Controls samples were performed in the same manner as the viral test at the time-points and rate of collection. A viral stock of SARS-CoV-2USA_CA1/2020 with a concentration of 4.02 X 10^7 TCID50/mL was used for this experiment.

Inoculation of Surface Samples

Surface inoculation consisted of applying exactly 1 ml of viral media to each coupon with a calibrated Eppendorf pipette utilizing filtered pipette tips. Coupons were standard sterile 25mm x 75mm slides. Once applied, the media was spread thin using a disposable spatula and allowed to dry for 10 minutes. The starting concentration of virus that was applied was 4.02 X 10^7 TCID50/mL. After several tests for recovery, it was determined that the most efficient method of recovering viable virus would be a 2 mL rinse in viral media followed by a swab of the inoculated area. The maximum recovery achieved was 95.3% or 3.83 X 10^7 TCID50/mL. This value was used as the “0 Minute” starting concentration for all surface testing to account for the recovery.

Test Results: Aerosolized Virus

image

SARS-C0V-2 USA_CA1/2020 Viral Inactivation (Aerosol)

10

1

0.1

0.01

0.001

0.0001

0.00001

Exposure Time

image

Performed in the same manner as the control testing, the following deactivation rates were observed for air samples collected for all 3 trials. Collection at each time point was done via the Gillian 10i air samplers. Samples were collected by a technician at specified time points inside the container and stored in a sealed refrigerated container until testing and recovery were complete. Technicians were wearing full hazmat coveralls and had no direct exposure to the pathogen at any time. The graph below represents the data for the three experiments and the control, as it pertains to surface inoculation.












































0 Min

20 Min

40 Min

60 Min

80 Min

120 Min

180 Min

Control

4.02

2.37

0.934

0.364

0.0838

0.0348

0.00368

Experiment 1

4.02

0.0187

0.00696

0.0000846

0.0000226

0.000012

0.000012

Experiment 2

4.02

0.0246

0.0086

0.0001094

0.000012

0.000012

0.000012

Experiment 3

4.02

0.0296

0.00802

0.0000889

0.0000138

0.000012

0.000012


Test Results: Surface Inoculation

image

SARS-COV-2 USA_CA1/2020 Viral Inactivation ( Surface )

10

1

0.1

0.01

0.001

0.0001

0.00001

Exposure Time

image

Performed in the same manner as the control testing, the following deactivation rates were observed for direct surface inoculation in the three challenge trials. Collection at each time point was done by swab and rinse of the coupon. Samples were collected by a technician at specified time points inside the container and stored in viral media until testing and recovery were complete. Technicians were wearing full hazmat coveralls and had no direct exposure to the pathogen at any time. The graph below represents the data for the three surface inoculation experiments and the control.












































0 Min

20 Min

40 Min

60 Min

80 Min

120 Min

180 Min

Control

3.83

3.48

3.17

2.94

2.79

2.16

1.42

Experiment 1

3.83

0.671

0.097

0.0328

0.00213

0.0000416

0.000012

Experiment 2

3.83

0.856

0.137

0.0298

0.00293

0.000042

0.000012

Experiment 3

3.83

0.999

0.144

0.0229

0.00274

0.0000412

0.000012


Data Table for Aerosol Testing - Control Trial


Time Point

TCID50/mL

Percent Reduction

0 MINUTES

4.02 X 10^7

N/A

20 MINUTES

2.37 X 10^7

41.04

40 MINUTES

9.34 X 10^6

76.77

60 MINUTES

3.64 X 10^6

90.95

80 MINUTES

8.38 X 10^5

97.92

120 MINUTES

3.48 X 10^5

99.13

180 MINUTES

3.68 X 10^4

99.91



Data Table for Aerosol Testing - Averages of Three Challenge Trials.


TIME POINT

TCID50/mL

Percent Reduction

0 MINUTES

4.02 X 10^7

N/A

20 MINUTES

2.43 X 10^5

99.40

40 MINUTES

7.86 X 10^3

99.98

60 MINUTES

9.43 X 10^2

99.99

80 MINUTES

< 1.2 X 10^2

>99.999

120 MINUTES

< 1.2 X 10^2

>99.999

180 MINUTES

< 1.2 X 10^2

>99.999


Data Table for Surface Testing - Control Trial


Time Point

TCID50/mL

Percent Reduction

0 MINUTES

3.83 X 10^7

4.72

20 MINUTES

3.48 X 10^7

9.14

40 MINUTES

3.17 X 10^7

17.23

60 MINUTES

2.94 X 10^7

23.23

80 MINUTES

2.79 X 10^7

27.15

120 MINUTES

2.16 X 10^7

43.60

180 MINUTES

1.42 X 10^7

62.92


Data Table for Surface Testing – Averages of Three Challenge Trials


Time Point

TCID50/mL

Percent Reduction

0 Min

3.83 X 10^7

4.72

20 Min

8.43 X 10^6

77.99

40 Min

1.26 X 10^6

96.71

60 Min

2.85 X 10^5

99.26

80 Min

2.60 X 10^4

99.93

120 Min

4.16 X 10^2

99.999

180 Min

< 1.20 X 10^2

>99.999

CONCLUSIONS:

The PYURE MDU/Rx™ device performed to manufacturer specifications and demonstrated a progressive and dramatic reduction of live virus after 80 minutes of exposure in aerosol form and 180 minutes of exposure in surface testing. The live SARS-CoV-2 virus was not detectable at these timepoints (levels were below the 120 TCID50 / ml limit of quantification).

Every effort was made to simulate a real-life environment in the chamber while taking into consideration the special precautions needed when working with a Biosafety Level 3 Pathogen. Taking into consideration the high starting concentration of active SARS-CoV-2 virus, the volume aerosolized, and the volume inoculated, one could assume that the likelihood of entering an environment with this quantity of pathogen in a real-life circumstance to be unlikely.

When aerosolizing pathogens and collecting said pathogens, there are variables that cannot be fully accounted for, namely, placement of pathogen, collection volume, collection points, drop rate, surface saturation, viral destruction on collection, viral destruction on nebulization, and possibly others. Every effort was made to address these constraints with the design and execution of the trials. These efforts are reflected in the meaningful recovery of live virus in the control tests.

Taking these variables into account, there was a high rate of virus destruction achieved by the MDU/Rx™ device. The reduction in air and on surfaces was significant and consistent with the manufacturer’s

claims that the organic oxidants produced by the MDU/Rx™ device diffuse into a treated space and

destroy the virus in air and on surfaces. Overall, the MDU/Rx™ device showed substantial efficacy in the destruction of SARS-CoV-2USA_CA1/2020 in air and on surfaces.

DISCLAIMER:

The Innovative BioAnalysis, LLC. (“Innovative BioAnalysis”) laboratory is not certified or licensed by the United States Environmental Protection Agency and makes no equipment emissions claims pertaining to ozone, hydrogen peroxide gas, reactive oxygen species, volatile organic compounds, or byproduct of any MDU/RX™ device. Innovative BioAnalysis makes no claims to the overall efficacy of any MDU/RX™. The experiment results are solely applicable to the device used in the trial, serial number: MDURXA0000069. The results are only representative of the experiment design described in this report. Innovative BioAnalysis makes no claims as to the reproducibility of the experiment results given the possible variation of experiment results even with an identical test environment, viral strain, collection method, inoculation, nebulization, viral media, cell type, and culture procedure. Innovative BioAnalysis makes no claims to third parties and takes no responsibility for any consequences arising out of the use of, or reliance on, the experiment results by third parties.

image

11/30/2020

image image

Dr. Dana Yee M.D Date

Clinical Pathologist and Medical Director

image

11/30/2020

image

Sam Kabbani, MS, BS, MT(ASCP), CLS Date

Chief Scientific Officer, Innovative Bioanalysis

image

11/30/2020

image

Albert Brockman Date

Chief Biosafety Officer, Innovative Bioanalysis

image

11/30/2020

image

Kevin Noble Date

Chief Operating Officer, Innovative Bioanalysis

Benefits of Odorox/Pyure! Client Testimonials, Removes Odors, Kills Germs, Kills Covid-19

Our neighbor smokes constantly and since the ventilation in our building isn't adequate, the smoke fills our office as well.

As a non-profit that serves pregnant women and young children, it was a constant frustration. We had even reached the point where we were going to look for new space. When John installed the two Odorox Air machines, we noticed the difference quickly. The air cleared up! Even the baby clothes we provide our clients stopped reeking of smoke! Our clients and volunteers commented on the difference. We are so grateful for these machines. They work so well and solved our problem!

Aimee Huber, Executive Director
First Choice Women's Resource Centers
Morristown, NJ

First Choice

I would like to share the experience my family has had since bringing an Odorox Slim Line machine in to our apartment.

Please allow me to start by providing some background information. My daughter, who is 6, and I live in a 900 sq ft apartment in a 24 unit building in north Bismarck. We have lived there for over 5 years. My daughter has many health issues including chronic constipation, reflux, sinus issues and her IGG subclass II is low (basic immune deficiency).

Since bringing the Odorox unit in to our home in January, we have had our healthiest winter ever. In the past she has suffered from repeat sinus infections, often times each lasting more than one month. Prior to starting the Odorox Machine she had been fighting the same infection for over three months. We tried three separate rounds of oral antibiotics, an IVIG infusion and IV antibiotics and saw little if any results. Two weeks after instaiing the machine, her congestion was gone and has not returned. Her only infection since was an ear infection. This in itself is nothing sh01i of amazing. She has never gone this long without being placed on some so1i of medicine. We tried allergy medicines, antibiotics (oral and iv), ENT involvement, removed her tonsils and adenoids and nothing provided her with any relief. We also did both skin and blood testing for allergies, both of which came back negative. She herself has noticed the difference and comments on all of the different things she can now smell (flowers, lotions, soaps).

I almost need to mention that I am surprised how well this little machine controls odors.
I can no longer smell what other people in the building are cooking or if they are smoking.

I am truly amazed at the difference this machine has made. I will admit I was highly skeptical that this "magic machine" would do anything for us. In fact, I have even tried shutting the machine off for three days, only to tum it back on as her congestion was returning. I am sold as to the effectiveness and validity of this machine.


Sincerely,

Heidi Stroh

Heidi Stroh

Send us a message

our address190 Summerhill Road
Spotswood NJ 08884
call us (732) 251-9506 Ext.211
email us [email protected]